# modules namespace on wiki

**URL:** https://forum.vassalengine.org/t/modules-namespace-on-wiki/3164
**Category:** General Discussion
**Created:** [August 9, 2010, 8:16pm UTC](https://forum.vassalengine.org/t/modules-namespace-on-wiki/3164 "2010-08-09T20:16:22Z")
**Posts on this page:** 4
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![uckelman](https://forum.vassalengine.org/user_avatar/forum.vassalengine.org/uckelman/32/10020_2.png) [@uckelman](https://forum.vassalengine.org/u/uckelman)
#### Post date: [August 9, 2010, 8:16pm UTC](https://forum.vassalengine.org/t/modules-namespace-on-wiki/3164/1 "2010-08-09T20:16:22Z")

</div>

Someone raised the issue on ConsimWorld of why the modules should be in their own namespace in the wiki. Presently, all of the module pages have “Module:” prefixed to them to indicate that. It’s not particularly pretty, and doesn’t help with finding or categorizing modules so far as I can see, as modules already have their own category.

Hence, I’m proposing that we move the modules into the main namespace and get rid of the module namespace. (I.e., the page Module:Foo will become simply Foo.)

Tim, if we do this, I’ll write a script for it, so it won’t be any work for you. What interests me now is a discussion of the merits of doing it or not.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![cparrott](https://forum.vassalengine.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/c/ecd19e/32.png) [@cparrott](https://forum.vassalengine.org/u/cparrott)
#### Post date: [August 9, 2010, 8:26pm UTC](https://forum.vassalengine.org/t/modules-namespace-on-wiki/3164/2 "2010-08-09T20:26:51Z")

</div>

I initially felt it was redundant to have Module: telling me it was a module  
when I was on the module page. But in the interests of wikis is there  
something else it accomplishes? Does it help with external linking from  
other wikis?

-----Original Message-----  
From: [messages-bounces@vassalengine.org](mailto:messages-bounces@vassalengine.org)  
[[mailto:messages-bounces@vassalengine.org](mailto:messages-bounces@vassalengine.org)] On Behalf Of uckelman  
Sent: Monday, August 09, 2010 4:16 PM  
To: [messages@vassalengine.org](mailto:messages@vassalengine.org)  
Subject: [messages] [General Discussion] modules namespace on wiki

Someone raised the issue on ConsimWorld of why the modules should be in  
their own namespace in the wiki. Presently, all of the module pages have  
“Module:” prefixed to them to indicate that. It’s not particularly pretty,  
and doesn’t help with finding or categorizing modules so far as I can see,  
as modules already have their own category.

Hence, I’m proposing that we move the modules into the main namespace and  
get rid of the module namespace. (I.e., the page Module:Foo will become  
simply Foo.)

Tim, if we do this, I’ll write a script for it, so it won’t be any work for  
you. What interests me now is a discussion of the merits of doing it or not.

* * *

Read this topic online here:  
[https://forum.vassalengine.org/t/modules-namespace-on-wiki/3164/1](https://forum.vassalengine.org/t/modules-namespace-on-wiki/3164/1)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![uckelman](https://forum.vassalengine.org/user_avatar/forum.vassalengine.org/uckelman/32/10020_2.png) [@uckelman](https://forum.vassalengine.org/u/uckelman)
#### Post date: [August 9, 2010, 8:35pm UTC](https://forum.vassalengine.org/t/modules-namespace-on-wiki/3164/3 "2010-08-09T20:35:13Z")

</div>

Thus spake “Chuck Parrott”:

> I initially felt it was redundant to have Module: telling me it was a module  
> when I was on the module page. But in the interests of wikis is there  
> something else it accomplishes? Does it help with external linking from  
> other wikis?

What I initially thought it would be good for is that it lets you search  
the module pages separately from the other (documentation) pages.

–  
J.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Tim\_M](https://forum.vassalengine.org/user_avatar/forum.vassalengine.org/tim_m/32/2_2.png) [@Tim\_M](https://forum.vassalengine.org/u/Tim_M)
#### Post date: [August 9, 2010, 8:41pm UTC](https://forum.vassalengine.org/t/modules-namespace-on-wiki/3164/4 "2010-08-09T20:41:49Z")

</div>

All for it. We can provide various�access options to the modules�with the  
different category tags we’ve been building up (Era, Publisher, Alphabetical,  
Topic, Series, etc…)�on the main wiki front page

Couple of caveats

Can you�skip any page with a “Cleanup” tag - its useful being able to  
distinguish Module pages vs Regular pages�with the Module prefix in that  
area�right now

You may get collisions with pages in DeleteMe and possibly TBD-Orphan. You’ll  
want to overwrite those if they exist with identical page name.

Thats it

* * *

From: uckelman [uckelman@nomic.net](mailto:uckelman@nomic.net)  
To: [messages@vassalengine.org](mailto:messages@vassalengine.org)  
Sent: Mon, August 9, 2010 3:16:22 PM  
Subject: [messages] [General Discussion] modules namespace on wiki

Someone raised the issue on ConsimWorld of why the modules should be in  
their own namespace in the wiki. Presently, all of the module pages have  
“Module:” prefixed to them to indicate that. It’s not particularly  
pretty, and doesn’t help with finding or categorizing modules so far as  
I can see, as modules already have their own category.

Hence, I’m proposing that we move the modules into the main namespace  
and get rid of the module namespace. (I.e., the page Module:Foo will  
become simply Foo.)

Tim, if we do this, I’ll write a script for it, so it won’t be any work  
for you. What interests me now is a discussion of the merits of doing it  
or not.

* * *

Read this topic online here:  
[https://forum.vassalengine.org/t/modules-namespace-on-wiki/3164/1](https://forum.vassalengine.org/t/modules-namespace-on-wiki/3164/1)
