# "Wrong order" of module extensions

**URL:** <https://forum.vassalengine.org/t/wrong-order-of-module-extensions/2533>\
**Category:** Technical Support & Bugs\
**Created:** [November 13, 2009, 6:53am UTC](https://forum.vassalengine.org/t/wrong-order-of-module-extensions/2533 "2009-11-13T06:53:12Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![meng](https://forum.vassalengine.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/m/2acd7d/32.png) [@meng](https://forum.vassalengine.org/u/meng)\
**Post date:** [November 13, 2009, 6:53am UTC](https://forum.vassalengine.org/t/wrong-order-of-module-extensions/2533/1 "2009-11-13T06:53:12Z")

</div>

I have VASSAL installed on three different Linux systems, with the Combat Commander: Europe module and its 4 extensions.

On one of my systems (which also happens to be the one I use most), whenever I open the CC:E module, I get this listing:

- Combat Commander: Europe version 2.0
- Extension 1. Combat Commander - Mediterranean v2.0 loaded
- Extension 3. Battle Pack 1 - Paratroopers v2.0 loaded
- Extension 2. Battle Pack 0 - European Nations v2.0 loaded
- Extension 4. Battle Pack 2 - Stalingrad v2.0 loaded

even though I added the extensions in order 1-2-3-4. I think this is why my module checksum is different from anyone else’s. Removing and re-adding the extensions makes no difference.

In the main VASSAL windows, the order of extensions is 1-2-3-4.