Are you expecting that to be a file to download? An editable block of text like the current Readme section? Something else?
I believe these are the log entries for your attempt:
2025-06-30T23:32:47.524708Z INFO request{source=172.92.205.209 method=POST uri=
/v1/projects/703/packages/Module/6.22.0/CaseBlue%20GBII%20v6.22.0.vmod version=H
TTP/1.1}: starting add_file
2025-06-30T23:32:47.526350Z INFO request{source=172.92.205.209 method=POST uri=/v1/projects/703/packages/Module/6.22.0/CaseBlue%20GBII%20v6.22.0.vmod version=HTTP/1.1}: created temp file uploads/atmp_22510007f2375beb1e068631e9f1f4a56ff
2025-06-30T23:34:47.536286Z INFO request{source=172.92.205.209 method=POST uri=
/v1/projects/703/packages/Module/6.22.0/CaseBlue%20GBII%20v6.22.0.vmod version=H
TTP/1.1}: finished processing request latency=120013 ms status=408
It appears that your request still timed out after 120 seconds. I don’t understand how that can be. I also don’t understand why you don’t get the timeout message that the backend sends.
I like the editable block of text, so that would be my choice. It is important that users can read it immediately so that they can decide if this download is of interest to them without having to download a file first.
1 Like
Incomprehensible error code for my latest new project.
Went through fine clicking on the checkmark the 2nd time.
It’s possible you were trying to create the project while I was editing something in the database.
Did this–I thought–11 days ago. Did I send wrong? An attempt just now seemed to be opening up a new discussion, which surely wasn’t right. How does one message privately? Or is that a moot point now? I see this discussion appears still extremely active, with quick and helpful results.
I did receive your message. It’s still in the queue. I’m prioritizing requests which can be completed in the time I have when I sit down to work, before I have to stop to do something else. Yours is among the more complex ones, so hasn’t fit into a block of available time yet. I will get to it.
1 Like
Project creation times have been reset to the earliest timestamp associated with the project. This fixes a problem you might have noticed with projects which were recently split having creation dates which appeared later than the publication dates of some of their files.
1 Like
This doesn’t seem to have worked correctly for Terraforming Mars; all 4 projects are showing as “9 years ago”, when they should vary from 5 to 9 years (the “French & English” version should actually be 8 years, created in Dec. 2017, although the oldest file still listed under the project is only 5 years old).
It worked correctly. The box image is about 9 years old, rounded up.
Okay, technically that’s correct, but I’m not sure it’s useful to have all 4 projects show the same age! Oh well, it’s not a big deal, if you find you have the mood and time to change it, great, if not, I won’t mention it again.
If you reupload the box image (even the same one), then the next time I run the script, it will adjust the the project creation time.
Don’t worry about duplicating image files in this case. They will be deduplicated later.
If you attempt to upload a module with a version that doesn’t match the release you’re adding it to, you will now get an error message before your upload starts.
Is it possible to delete an entire Project? I accidentally put up two Waterloo modules in my first attempt to upload to the New Library. If I can’t delete it myself, could you be so kind as to remove the one titled Waterloo_Tournament_ Edition? Thanks.
Frank
I tried uploading the updated module again this am.
Took 3.5 minutes total, and this time it finally worked…no error messages. 
I’m glad it’s working for you, but I changed nothing. I still don’t know what I need to adjust to increase the timeout for the proxy.
It’s now possible to rename packages and edit their sort keys.
While going through the OCS modules to standardize Package naming, I discovered that every single module on the Burma page has disappeared into thin air. Can you please investigate and rectify when you get a chance? I have not manipulated this page recently, and did not notice this issue before when perusing through the page in the recent past.
Burma is one of the pages where packages weren’t created properly on import. I’ve fixed it now.
Please, please, please raise import issues with individual modules in a PM or on a new thread. I cannot track them efficiently here on this thread.
1 Like
I’ve deleted the Waterloo_Tournament_ Edition project for you.
You may want to correct the game title of the Waterloo_AH_Tournament project so that it doesn’t contain underscores.
Please, please, please raise issues with individual modules in a PM or on a new thread. I cannot track them efficiently here on this thread.
1 Like